#53 New “Archaeological Sites” Google Earth Layer

I saw this headline and was pretty excited.  According to the AIA website, they contacted state archaeologists from the United States and Canada to gather the information for the map.  They claim that they had an “overwhelming response”.  Well, I gotta tell you, I’m a bit underwhelmed at the number of sites in Nevada.  Take a look.

From Google Earth.

One site.  That’s right.  One site.  The Bodie Historic District is in California.  The only site we got was Fort Churchill.  Sad.

I’ve recorded or have been on a team that recorded literally thousands of sites across northern Nevada.  Now, I understand that the public doesn’t want to see and probably doesn’t even want to know about a few thousand two-flake lithic scatters but that’s not the point.  There are likely many sites that could be brought to the public’s attention.

I can hear the argument already.  Where is the money to develop these sites into something the public can go and see?  The money should come from the billion dollar projects that are being built around these sites.  The most important sites in this state are being mitigated or avoided so there should be some that could be set up for public viewing.

It would be nice if large companies were required to agree to display or somehow preserve for the public any important or significant sites located during the survey of their property.

Also, how much thought did the Nevada SHPO put into the request for sites from the AIA?  I can think of plenty of other sites that are publicly accessible including a few state parks and recreation areas.  Sounds like they either didn’t have the money to devote to this project or they just didn’t care.  The AIA should have asked the BLM.

Written in Sparks, Nevada

Handmark

2008  The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Archaeology (iPad App), Oxford University Press, 2nd ed.   Developed by Handmark, Inc.

Mitigation Strategy The program of works developed to conserve, protect, record, and/or investigate archaeological structures and deposits that are threatened by wholesale or partial destruction through some kind of construction work, quarrying, or natural erosion.  Such proposals may, for example, include the use of particular foundation designs to minimize the impact of construction on buried deposits, or the use of open space to allow the in situ preservation or significant remains.  Equally, a mitigation strategy may comprise rescue excavation and site-recording operations in advance of destruction.

#52 Walmart Strikes Again

"Planners support Walmart SUP"

Orange County, VA - Walmart is trying to build a large store (do they build any other kind?) in Virginia.  The county's Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the special use permit application that Walmart needs to move forward on the proposed site.  The surprising twist relates to the archaeology.

The most substantive condition discussed related to archaeological artifacts and resources which may be found on the nearly 30-acre site at the intersection of Rt. 3 and Rt. 708 in the county's eastern end. 
According to Orange County Attorney Sharon Pandak, Walmart officials have agreed to increase their level of archaeological studies beyond what may be required by law. 
The National Historic Preservation Act calls for three phases of study, with the later phases triggered by resources found in preceding studies. 
In this case, she explained, Walmart is agreeing to all three levels of study-whether they're compelled to or not. As part of that agreement, an archaeologist will be on site during initial clearing and grading to catalog or recover artifacts and to document any findings and make them available to the county.

Well then.  Walmart has agreed to do ALL phases of study whether they are told to or not.  I hope someone follows up on this.  It would be interesting if they agree to mitigate a massive site for hundreds of thousands of dollars.  I really hope the archaeologists find something.

Written in Sparks, Nevada

Handmark

2008  The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Archaeology (iPad App), Oxford University Press, 2nd ed.   Developed by Handmark, Inc.

National Historic Preservation Act An Act that came into force in the USA in 1966, and which has been variously amended since, which establishes a programme for the preservation of historic properties throughout the United States.  It covers the National Register of Historic Places and National Historic Landmarks; the creation of State Historic Preservation Officers; the need for federal agencies to take into account the impact on archaeological and historical resources of any projects they undertake or support (known as a Section 106 review); the establishment of a preservation programme by each federal agency; and the establishment of an Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

#51 Pre-Clovis weapon found in US

"Early hunters: Pre-Clovis weapon found in US"

The tip of a bone point fragment found embedded in a mastodon rib from an archaeological site in Washington state shows that hunters were present in North America at least 800 years before Clovis.

Dr. Michael Waters explains in the clip below.

The site is the Manis site in Washington State.  The bone was radiocarbon dated to 13,800 years ago.  That is 800 years earlier than was previously believed.  The discovery was published this week in Science.  

“The Manis site is an early kill site,” Waters says. “The evidence from the Manis site shows that people were hunting mastodons with bone weapons before the Clovis stone spear point.”

The Manis site was excavated in the late 1970s.  No stone tools were discovered at the mastodon kill site.  A bone point was found sticking out of one of the ribs, however.  At that time there was no way to date the bone point.  Waters contacted the original excavator and gained permission to test the rib and the bone point.  They returned the 13,800 year old date.  The bone point is also from a mastodon.

It is commonly thought that it took the stone spear points of the Clovis culture to take down the megafauna of the time.  This proves that they could be taken down by other means and that the Clovis weren't the only culture to hunt mastodon, and likely other megafauna, in this area.

Written in Sparks, Nevada

Handmark

2008  The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Archaeology (iPad App), Oxford University Press, 2nd ed.   Developed by Handmark, Inc.

Megafauna Extinction All over the world the early Holocene period saw the decline and extinction of megafauna.  The causes of this are a matter of some debate.  Changing environmental and climatic conditions must have played a part, but so too did the activities of hunter-gatherer populations.  With reference to North America, where 32 genera of mammals became extinct, Paul Martin has argued that the Clovis Culture big-game hunters were responsible for the megafauna extinction because of wasteful hunting methods.

#50 Arizona Land Swap Could Damage Cultural Resources

The headline from Science, "Breaking News: Archaeology Groups Oppose Proposed Arizona Land Swap".

An offshoot of the international mining firm Rio Tinto is trying to gain 2400 acres of land south of Phoenix to mine a supposed deposit of high quality copper.  Read this carefully.  They aren't leasing federal land.  They are trading federal land for private land that would become federal.  Sneaky.

The proposal (H.R. 1904) would swap U.S. Forest Service land about 70 miles south of Phoenix for an array of privately owned lands elsewhere in the state. Under the arrangement, initially floated in 2005, Resolution Copper Co., an offshoot of global mining leader Rio Tinto (Resolution Copper), would get about 2400 acres of land believed to sit atop a vast deposit of high-quality copper. The federal government would get about 5300 acres in exchange, including 3000 acres of ecologically important land along the lower San Pedro River.

On the surface it looks like the American people would gain 2900 acres of land and loose nothing.  In reality, the mining company has found a way around the need to obtain an Environmental Impact Statement.  From what I can tell they would not be required to assess the archaeological resources, the biological resources, or any other resources.  Companies can do whatever they want on private land.  A closer look at this case could reveal that the mine has been buying up land for years in anticipation of this deal.

I hope the SAA and the other groups that are opposing this deal get their voices heard.  Deals like this would open the door for other mines to do the same and cultural resources as we know them would disappear.

Written in Sparks, Nevada

Handmark

2008  The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Archaeology (iPad App), Oxford University Press, 2nd ed.   Developed by Handmark, Inc.

Environmental Impact Statement A process that since the mid 1970s has been developed and increasingly applied to large and medium-sized development proposals whereby technical studies are undertaken in order to predict the likely impact that the scheme will have on the local, regional, and global environment.  The aim is to better inform the decision-making process, allow alternative proposals to be compared, and where appropriate, promote the development of acceptable mitigation measures.  EIA was first applied widely in the USA; it was made a legal requirement for certain types of scheme in Europe following a European Community Directive issued in 1985.  Archaeological remains are one of the resources that can be included in the scope of an EIA where it is believed that such things might be significantly affected by a proposed project.  Also known as Environmental Assessment.

#49 Dr. Douglas Bamforth and the Mahaffy Cache

A few weeks ago I attended a lecture at the University of Nevada, Reno called “Clovis in your backyard”.  I’ve only just now gotten around to writing about it.  For that, I apologize to the 30 people that read this.  On to the post.

Dr. Bamforth and Patrick Mahaffy (http://neveryetmelted.com/categories/mahaffy-cache/)Dr. Douglas Bamforth is a professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder.  He is also a Faculty Affiliate at the Center of the American West, also at the University of Colorado.  Dr. Bamforth came to UNR to discuss the 13,000 year old Mahaffy cache that was discovered in 2009.

As he tells it, a project fell into Dr. Bamforth’s lap that was nearly in his backyard.  His office received a called from a local man, Patrick Mahaffy, who said that some artifacts turned up during the landscaping of his back yard.  The excavation of a coy pond revealed a cache of 83 artifacts.

The Mahaffy Cache (http://academyll.org/files/Douglas%20Bamforth%20-%20Mahaffy%20Cache%20(Clovis).pdf)The cache included points of various sizes and stages of completion.  There were four different types of stone, two cherts and two quartzites, and none of it was local.  The chert types are called Kremmling and Bridger Basin chert (Tiger chert).  The quartzites were from Windy Ridge and the Uinta Formation.

Artifact types within the cache included core struck flakes and backed pieces (sharp edge with a non-sharp opposite margin).  There were also blades, which are twice as long as they are wide.  The blades included several accidental blades and four true blades.  Bifacial knives made of both chert and quartzite were also present.  Unique to this cache (in the world, according to Bamforth) was a large, two-handed, double-bitted bifacial chopper.

Dr. Bamforth’s biggest question was how old is the Mahaffy cache?  To help answer that question Bamforth used what he called “penguin logic”.  I honestly can’t remember why he called it that but it boils down to logic.  It is not necessarily a paleoindian cache just because there are paleoindian blades.  Also, there are no diagnostic artifacts in the Mahaffy cache.  There is nothing, like a Clovis point for example, that says, this cache dates to blank.

So, Bamforth used other indirect and relative methods of dating.

Two types of chert in the cache. (http://academyll.org/files/Douglas%20Bamforth%20-%20Mahaffy%20Cache%20(Clovis).pdf)The initial dating analysis discussed by Dr. Bamforth during the lecture involved the “black mats” of the Younger Dryas.  These “mats” were discussed by Vance Haynes.  Artifacts can be relatively dated by assessing their provenience in association with the mats.  In this case, however, many of the artifacts were already removed by the time Bamforth arrived and the rest of the excavated hole was too disturbed to make a clear determination. 

The name sake of the cache and owner of the property, Patrick Mahaffy, is rather wealthy.  Since the artifacts were discovered on his property it was up to him as to what would be done with them.  Dr. Bamforth suggested that they submit the artifacts to protein residue analysis by way of cross-over immunoelectrophoresis (CIEP), an expensive process.

All 83 pieces were sent for testing and four came back with positive hits.  To be sure, the four hits were run three times.  A backed chert piece came back with sheep protein.  Bear protein was found on a giant quartzite biface.  Another biface was used on a horse.  The final hit was a piece used on a camel.  The sheep and bear were not significant.  The horse and camel were.  The last time horse and camel species were seen in Boulder County was 13,000 years ago.  

So, the two pieces in cache that hit for horse and camel were either made and used in the 20th century or they date to at least 13,000 years ago.  Similarities in this cache to a biface in the well known Fenn cache suggest that the Mahaffy cache is Clovis.

Based on what they had found so far Bamforth wondered what the Mahaffy cache could tell him about the Clovis people.  His answer? Diet.  Bamforth explains.

Two-handed double-bitted biface. (http://academyll.org/files/Douglas%20Bamforth%20-%20Mahaffy%20Cache%20(Clovis).pdf)The tools were transported over long distances.  Some flake scars were rounded over from rubbing against other pieces.  The pieces made from material that was sourced further away exhibited more rounded scars.  Also, there was little evidence of resharpening on the Mahaffy cache tools.  In fact, they were barely used at all.  They seem to have been transported in the condition that they were found.  

Also, why was the cache found in Pat Mahaffy’s front yard?  According to Bamforth, Gregory Creek flows east out of the Flatiron Mountains near Boulder.  That creek runs right through Mahaffy’s back yard, or did, thousands of years ago.

Bamforth suggests that the cache was an insurance policy.  It was placed there for future use in that area.  The location and structure of the cache implies predictability and knowledge.  Those people planned to come back.  Bamforth feels that Clovis have been mischaracterized in the past.  They were not wandering and misguided.  They had purpose and direction.

The discovery of the Mahaffy cache and the results of the investigation prove what many already know.  There is much that we do not know and do not understand about Clovis culture and the cultures before them.  Much research is left to be done and more sites need to be found.

I found the slide presentation that Dr. Bamforth used here.

Written in Sparks, Nevada.

Handmark

2008  The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Archaeology (iPad App), Oxford University Press, 2nd ed.   Developed by Handmark, Inc.

Clovis Culture Early Paleo-Indian culture dating to the period 9500-9000 BC and represened widely over the central and southern plains area of North America.  Clovis Culture communities are well known as big game hunters, especially fond of mammoth and bison.  They also took smaller game such as deer and rabbits, and used plant resources too.  They are mainly recognized archaeologically by a distinctive chipped stone industry which includes Clovis points.  The Clovis Culture is sometimes referred to as the Llano.

#48 The Reno Coalition of Reason Billboard Campaign

The Reno Coalition of Reason issued a press release today annoucing the erection of two billboards in the Reno, Nevada area.

Thanks to Ben for getting the photo up so quickly!

The press release was sent out to all of the major news outlets in the area and as of this writting, only one interview has been conducted.  None of the major news outlets have reported on the billboards and the interview has not appeared on KRNV website.  The interview was conducted prior to the afternoon news broadcast but was apparently not important enough to make it on air.  Our hope is that it makes it to the evening news cast.

We hope that the news media in Reno don't decide to brush this ad campaign under the rug.  The billboards are in well-traveled areas so a lot of people should see them.  Also, the Reno Coalition of Reason is marching in the Nevada Day Parade on Saturday. So, at least a few thousand people will hear of us at that time.

We're hoping to gain new members and to step up our activism with these two events.  We aren't looking to disparage anyone's religion or make anyone upset.  We just want people to know that we are here and that if they think the way we do, there are others like them.  You don't have to believe in a god to be a good person.

PLEASE comment if you have an opinion.

Written in Sparks, NV.

#47 Artifacts in Public

So I've seen two articles in the past week that deal with the private ownership of artifacts.  One is from West Virginia and the other from Texas.

"Indian Artifacts on Display at Saturday Show"

  -From the Fredericksburg Standard, Fredericksburg, Texas October 12, 2011

The story starts out:

"Collectors of rare and ancient arrowheads along with other objects relating to Native Americans will be in town Saturday when the annual Fredericksburg Indian Artifact Show returns"

When the show returns? How often has this show been coming back?  Where do these people get "fresh" artifacts for the annual event?  The article continues:

"As many as 70 tables will be set up by collectors from all over Texas to display historic artifacts for the benefit of buyers, sellers, traders or lookers interested in stopping by the pavilion that day."

Wow.  Seventy tables of artifacts.  That is disturbing.  I understand that it is not illegal to possess artifacts that you found on your own land but is it legal to sell those artifacts?  Also, are vendors required to show a pedigree for the artifacts?  Where did they get them?  Sounds shady.

"Free admission will also be provided for Gillespie County law enforcement officers..."

I guess if you grease the wheels you can slip under the law in Texas.

 

The second article is from Putnam County, West Virginia.

"Public invited to bring artifacts for identification"

This event is less disturbing than the last one but has similar problems.

"The public is invited to bring artifacts for professional archeologists to view and identify..."

Now, I wholeheartedly endorse the identification of artifacts by professional archaeologists.  It might give the archaeologists a chance to let people know that removing artifacts from public land is illegal.  Hopefully the people coming to the Market found their artifacts on their own property.  There is certainly less public land in West Virginia than in Texas.  However, I just hope that this doesn't encourage people to go out and "find" more artifacts for identification.  As long as the archaeologists refrain from appraising the artifacts then everyone should have a good time.

It seems like the main problem is that many people don't know that collecting artifacts from some place other than your own land is illegal.  Not only is it illegal but it robs the rest of us from enjoying them.  Those artifacts do not belong to any one person.  They belong to everyone and no one.  We should all have the pleasure of seeing a piece of history while we are out on a hike or are just enjoying nature.

Am I way off base here?  Let me know.  I don't have a problem with the West Virginia archaeologists identifying artifacts but I feel that the Texas show is not only immoral but is likely illegal.

Written in Ely, Nevada

Handmark

2008  The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Archaeology (iPad App), Oxford University Press, 2nd ed.   Developed by Handmark, Inc.

LOOT Acronym for the 'Listing of Outlaw Treachery'.

LOOT Clearinghouse An archival database of information on past archaeological incidents and cases which is maintained by the Archaeological Assistance Division of the American National Park Service in Washington, DC.