#67 Archaeological Vandalism Linked to Ignorance

"Archeological sites threatened by vandalism" -- The Rebel Yell, November 17, 2011

Nevada's historic cultural areas endangered by uninformed, expanding population

Since I started this blog I've discussed the need to inform the public about archaeological sites in their region.  This article is a good example as to why they need to understand what an archaeological site is and why it's important to protect and value it as a rich part of the heritage of this land.  On to the article.

http://unlvrebelyell.com/2011/11/17/archeological-sites-threatened-by-vandalism/The Cultural Site Stewardship Program at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, is an archaeological watchdog group that works under the Public Lands Institute and struggles against the ongoing vandalism against Nevada's cultural resources.

Native American and prehistoric sites are damaged almost on a weekly basis.  Habitation areas, such as rock shelters and Indian houses, known as wickiups, are the only remnants of past civilizations and lost cities found throughout the valley.

Project Manager George Phillips states that a lack of education within the general population causes the problem, as people don't understand what they are looking at when they see an archaeological site -- something the program is looking to combat with educational lectures held on a regular basis. [emphasis added]

A total of 122 incidents of significant impacts to cultural sites were recorded in a year.  There are 7,000 square miles in Clark County (Las Vegas) and several millions of acres in Nevada.  The Cultural Site Stewardship Program has a difficult time defending all of the known sites, not to mention all of the unknown sites.

"There are not enough rangers who can cover and protect these areas as law officials.  So we step in with volunteers who are trained and go out and monitor these sites and see what changes occur from one time to another," Phillips said. "The stewards are trained to know what their site is and what to watch for and changes are reported.  The Bureau of Land Management decides what action to take at that point."

There are groups that assist the program by looking for abandon mines and groups that are trained in surveying to record the locations of sites.

 

The work this group is doing is needed throughout the state.  Literally thousands of sites are recorded across the state in a single field season.  Many of those sites are not what the state considers "significant" and would be nearly impossible to protect.  That being said, there is still a great deal to learn from these insignificant sites.  I've recorded sites before that were littered with flakes and some bifaces but contained no formal tools.  These sites were looted in the sense that the formal tools were removed.  However, the "looters" were likely ranchers and hunters that didn't know that leaving the tool where it was found was more important than putting it into a jar with others on the mantle at home.

Maybe education is what we really need.  Although, at times it seems hopeless.  Some people just don't think it's wrong to pick up or damage artifacts.  While walking around the desert it would seem absurd to not disturb a pile of rusty cans or a single projectile point if you didn't know how much there was to learn from them.  It's developing a respect for "other people's things", just like our parents were supposed to teach us, that people need to learn.  I don't know how to teach that to grown adults.  Education should start with people as young as possible and continue throughout their lifetimes.  A tall order indeed.

#66 Wind Farm Site in Lanai City, Hawaii Deemed Endangered

"Proposed wind farm site named 'endangered historic' area" --The Maui News, November 14, 2011

Lanai City, Hawaii - The Historic Hawaii Foundation has named the proposed site of a massive wind farm one of the states "most endangered historic places".  Hundreds of archaeological and cultural sites have been identified there.

Advocates for historic preservation said the 20,000-acre Ka'a ahupua'a is significant in Native Hawaiian cultural practices, stories and history.  Community members were concerned that Castle & Cooke's proposal to develop a 170-turbine wind farm in the area could disrupt the "cultural landscape" and change the experience of being in the area, said Historic Hawaii Foundation Executive Director Kiersten Faulkner.

Faulkner hopes that by having the site on the most endangered list it will help to open a dialogue between her organization and the energy company that would meet the need for renewable energy while respecting the cultural resources.

In ancient times, Ka'a had several coastal settlements, the largest heiau on the island and an extensive agricultural system in upland areas.  It also was noted for its fisheries, including an ancient turtle fishery.  There also are numerous stories about the area's mythological significance, including accounts of interactions between deities and human beings.

In modern times, ranching, goats, deer, and sheep have left the area eroded and windswept.  The area has been called a "barren, arid wasteland" by the Hawaiian Electric Co. and the wind farm developer, Castle & Cooke.

This is no reason for the companies to do whatever they please to the land.  A wind farm can exist there as long as the construction and placement of the windmills does little to no harm to the cultural resources.  I don't think that the placement of the windmills can avoid damaging the visual significance of the site to indigenous people in the area.  However, a balance can be achieved, I believe.  It'll be interesting to see how this turns out.

There are also problems that have to be address with failure of the windmills.  Windmills can fail spectacularly when they do.  The massive blades could gauge the landscape and destroy undiscovered features.

[Side note.  Squarespace is pissing me off.  When I notice a mistake IMMEDIATELY, and then fix it, Squarespace sends both the initial entry and the modified entry to several RSS readers.  The result is that you see them twice.  Sorry about that.] 

#65 Tourists on the Moon!

NASA Prepares for Moon Tourism” -- Physorg.com, November 15, 2011

Tourists on the Moon!  Where do I sign up?  Oh, here.

Companies like Virgin Galactic, with their burgeoning space program, are prompting NASA to consider declaring moon landing sites as historic preserves or national parks to protect them from future space tourists.

“Looting, that would be pretty bad,” says archaeologists Beth O’Leary of New Mexico State University in Las Cruces

Looting is the bane of archaeological sites, and O’Leary has spearheaded efforts to protect the moon landing sites before tourists leave Earth.  “I put landing people on the moon up there with creating fire as a technological achievement.”

From Apollo 11 to Apollo 17 (Remember Apollo 13? They didn’t land on the moon) six manned missions landed on the moon and left behind artifacts.  Each landed in a different spot.  The lunar rover is up there too.

Under NASA’s guidelines they call for a 1,200-acre “no-fly” zone around the Apollo 11 and Apollo 17 sites.  Tourists would be able to walk withing 82 yards of the Apollo 11 site where the first steps on the moon took place on July 20, 1969.

What is prompting this action from NASA?  Google’s $30 million Lunar X Prize will be awarded to the “first privately funded teams to safely land a robot on the surface of the Moon.”  At least two dozen teams are currently aspiring to reach that goal.  Part of the prize involves driving a robot rover a third of a mile on the moon.  NASA doesn’t want tracks running across Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong’s footprints.

How much debris, and potential artifacts, are on the moon?  At present, over 187 tons of trash and other debris is currently scattered about the surface.  Eventually, some sort of regulations will have to be set down as to what makes a historical site on the moon.  

First, who owns the moon?  No one has decided that yet.  There are people studying that, though.  So, the laws in the United States do not necessarily apply.  For example, by the time we land people there again there is a good chance that everything currently on the moon will be greater than 50 years old.  That would make those sites and artifacts historic by U.S. standards.

It looks like we have a ways to go before we can decide what to do about historical sites on the moon.  I’m just wondering how we are going to get the lunar regolith to go through the quarter-inch mesh in our screens!  We’ll have to develop some sort of enclosed pressure screen.  But, that is for a different time.

#64 CRM News Weekly Episode 1

As I mentioned a few posts ago I said I was going to try a podcast with current CRM related news.  Well, here it is.  The podcast was created on a MacBook Pro using Garage Band.  The music is all from Apple.  Once I figure this thing out I might get more creative and I might even post it to iTunes.  Until then, I'm sticking with this format.

Squarespace adds the link to the podcast at the bottom of the post.  You can listen within your browser or download it.

Here are the links to the articles in the show in the order that they appear.

1.  Rock Circles Linked to Ancient Indian Site

2.  BLM Busts Archaeological Vandals

3.  Archaeologists Find Ancient Native American Sites

4.  Mesa Verde a Model for Saving Cultural Resources

5.  Etiwan Indians Have a Long and Rich History on Daniel Island

 

CRM News Weekly, Episode 1

#63 Bones Found in French Quarter

"Bones found in New Orleans' French Quarter" -- KLTV, East Texas

Bones were found in an excavation destined to become a pool at a condo complex in New Orleans' French Quarter. The bodies are thought to belong to some of the area's first settlers, according to archaeologists.

Everyone once in a while, construction crews will dig up humans bones in the French Quarter - like in a tucked-away courtyard.

What?  I want to work in New Orleans now!

The first graveyard in the city was located in the area, from Toulouse to Saint Peter.  The coffins that are typically found are rough, simple and made of Cyprus.

Basically, the closer you get to the river the more likely you're going to find old things and the older the things are likely to be," archaeologist Jill Yakubik said.

Fifteen coffins were removed from the site.  Yakubik said that this is the site of the colony's first cemetery, before the city was founded.

State law requires a permit for the removal of human remains.  Some of the are being stored and analyzed at Louisiana State University and others are being processed a Yakubik's lab.

 

#62 Archaeology in Delaware is Wasteful and Unnecessary

"Archaeologists Fear Outcome of Congressional Debate on Highway Bill" - Science Insider, November 9, 2011

Since 1992 over 200 archaeology projects in Delaware have been funded by a piece of federal highway-building legislation known as the Transportation Enhancements (TE) program.  To date more than $51 million has come from the program.

Now, the U.S. Senate committee is looking at a new version of the program in an attempt to reauthorize the federal government's $50-billion-a-year surface transport funding system.  Archaeologists are watching the process closely.

Current law says that states must spend 10% of certain federal transport funds on enhancement projects.  One of the 12 types of activities, or enhancement projects, is "archaeological planning and research".  This means that about 2% of overall surface transport budgets go to enhancements (including all 12 categories).  That amount is about $12 billion since 1992.

In 2010 less than 1% of the available funds went to archaeologists in Delaware.  Certain projects could not have been completed if the funds were not available.

The current highway law expired in 2009.  Congress has been passing short-term extensions in the mean time while they attempt a major rewrite of the complicated an onerous law.  The Transportation and Infrastructure Committee has:

outlined a plan to authorize $230 billion for transportation infrastructure spending over 6 years.  that would be a significant cut from current levels...

...enhancements won't be included in the bill he expects to release later this year.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) has promised that states "will not be required to spend a specific amount of funding on specific types of projects, such as transportation museums or landscaping.

Some lawmakers in the Senate argue that the U.S. can no longer afford TE projects when there are bridges and roads to repair.  Senator John McCain (R-AZ) and other Republicans have offered amendments to the pending law to end or scale back the program.

McCain is building a reputation for undermining archaeology and environmental projects.  See my last post: #61.

It will be interesting to see how this all works out.  It's no surprise that funding for archaeology and environmental projects is in trouble with the re-writing of this program.  Why do Republicans completely reject these types of projects?  Is it all about money and jobs?  What motivates a Republican to hate anything that doesn't make them millions of dollars?  It takes an enlightened and evolved people to spend money on preservation and on things that will not provide an economic return but rather, a social return.  Someday we'll get there.

#61 GOP Loves Arizona Land Swap Idea

UPDATE TO #50 Arizona Land Swap

"For GOP, Arizona mine a job-creating model on US land" - The Miami Herald, November 11, 2011

So it turns out, to know one's surprise, that Republicans love the idea of using 2,400 acres of public land to create 3,700 jobs at a new copper mine in Arizona.  Predictable.

While environmental groups and other critics express alarm, key backers of the project say it could become a national model for creating jobs, 3,700 in this case.

A "national model for creating jobs"?!  How is that possible?  Can we just trade land and open mines across the country to create jobs?  A model is a template that can be used in other places.  This seems like a single case with few similarities to other situations in this country.  Calling it a model for job creation is a ploy by the proponents of this deal to appeal to the ideals of Republican leaders that are pushing this deal.  It's a sneaky, underhanded, political tactic.

The House of Representatives voted last week to approve the land swap which will require the mining company, Resolution Copper Co. to give more than 5,000 acres that it owns in Arizona to the federal government.  By transferring ownership of the land, rather than letting them lease it, the company bypasses laws that would require, among other things, a cultural resources inventory.

Archaeology groups and Indian tribes in Arizona oppose the plan, fearing that it will be too disruptive to the environment.  Officials in the Obama administration have joined the opponents, saying the project needs more study and that the company needs to consult more with local tribes.

The legislation now goes to the Senate where Arizona's Senators, McCain and Kyl, "vow to do whatever they can to get it passed".

Read this article.  If this goes through, and I'm sure that it will, it will set a precedent that will be hard to defeat.  It could mean the end of CRM archaeology in many large mining areas.  Also, what's to stop other other industries from using similar tactics?  There are massive areas of public land in the west that could be "traded" for other, less important, land.  I'm not sure what can be done about this but many people should be aware of this situation.  Pass it on.